Thread Transfer
Multimodal AI in Enterprise 2025
82% of business leaders use generative AI weekly. But 2025 marks the shift from text-only LLMs to multimodal systems. Here's which model to choose for documents, images, and real-time operations.
Jorgo Bardho
Founder, Thread Transfer
82% of business leaders now use generative AI at least weekly. But 2025 marks a critical inflection: the shift from text-only LLMs to multimodal systems that process text, images, audio, and video simultaneously. OpenAI's enterprise market share has dropped from 50% to 34% while Anthropic doubled from 12% to 24%—driven by enterprises demanding more than just chat completions. The question is no longer "Should we adopt AI?" but "Which multimodal stack prevents vendor lock-in while handling our documents, images, and real-time operations?"
The multimodal enterprise landscape in 2025
Multimodal AI refers to models that interpret and generate across multiple data types—text, images, audio, video, PDFs—within a single inference call. In 2023, GPT-4V introduced vision capabilities to the public. By late 2024, Claude 3.5 added image analysis. In early 2025, Gemini 3 achieved a historic 1501 Elo score on LMArena with a 1-million-token context window that handles text, code, images, video, audio, and PDFs seamlessly.
The enterprise adoption pattern is clear: 78% of enterprises now use a multi-model strategy with 2+ AI providers. Rather than one model dominating all tasks, strategic positioning has emerged—Claude for coding, Gemini for multimodal tasks, GPT for professional knowledge work. Security features (46%), cost optimization (44%), and performance improvements (42%) are the primary factors driving provider switches.
Document processing and compliance at scale
Regulated industries—finance, legal, healthcare—process thousands of multimodal documents for compliance: contracts with annotated clauses, signed forms with embedded tables, identity proofs with photos and text. Traditional OCR pipelines required separate systems for text extraction, image recognition, signature verification, and table parsing. Multimodal AI collapses this complexity.
A multimodal model reads documents like a human would—understanding layout, interpreting tables, identifying signatures and logos, recognizing red flags in text and visual cues. It can spot inconsistencies between document versions, verify data fields across modalities, and highlight compliance gaps or missing disclosures. In financial services, AI processes loan applications containing scanned PDFs, bank statements with charts, and hand-filled forms, ensuring all compliance checkboxes are met before approval.
H2O.ai launched H2OVL Mississippi 2B and 0.8B in late 2024, multimodal foundation models designed specifically for OCR and Document AI use cases. These compact yet efficient models deliver unmatched performance for vision and OCR tasks in enterprise environments and offer an economical solution for real-time document analysis.
Manufacturing and field operations
Manufacturing companies deploy models like Phi-4 on production lines where cameras detect defects and microphones monitor equipment sounds, all processed locally with no internet dependency and no data leaving the facility. Latency is measured in milliseconds, not seconds. A multimodal AI agent can assist frontline workers: when a field engineer shows an image of faulty equipment during a video call, the agent identifies parts, annotates issues, retrieves repair manuals, and guides the fix in real time.
A technician in the field can take a picture of a faulty machine part, upload it, and retrieve relevant maintenance logs, videos, and troubleshooting steps, all pulled from the enterprise knowledge base. This eliminates the need for separate visual search tools, document repositories, and diagnostic systems—multimodal AI unifies them into a single query interface.
R&D and engineering acceleration
Multimodal AI models read research papers, interpret diagrams (molecular structures, prototype schematics), cross-reference tables or graphs, and summarize key insights in plain language. The AI effectively acts as a research assistant that understands the full picture. In drug discovery, models process chemical structure diagrams and correlate them with patient trial data and documentation. In engineering R&D, AI analyzes product test reports containing visual inspection photos, thermal images, and annotation-heavy PDFs, dramatically reducing time-to-insight.
GLM-4.5V with cost-efficient MoE architecture, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking with exceptional reasoning capabilities in a compact format, and Qwen2.5-VL-32B-Instruct providing advanced visual agent capabilities for business automation represent the next wave of enterprise-ready models designed for R&D workflows.
Enterprise knowledge search transformation
Multimodal AI transforms internal search into a truly intelligent experience. Employees can query the system using natural language like "Show me how to calibrate model X with the red sensor error" and receive not just text results, but relevant screenshots, instructional videos, and annotated diagrams—all ranked by context and relevance. This eliminates the frustration of keyword-based search that returns hundreds of irrelevant documents or fails to surface visual guides buried in PowerPoint decks.
Organizations reduce AI-related technology costs by 40-60% by replacing multiple specialized systems—document search, image search, video indexing, transcript analysis—with unified multimodal platforms. The financial impact extends beyond infrastructure consolidation: faster time-to-answer, reduced training overhead, and fewer bottlenecks in critical workflows.
Model comparison for enterprise deployment
GPT-4.1 offers comprehensive text, image, and audio processing with 320ms real-time voice response—faster than human conversation speed. Pricing has been aggressively repositioned: $2 per million input tokens and $8 for output, a 26% reduction from GPT-4o. OpenAI introduced GPT-4.1 Mini at $0.40/$1.60 and the ultra-efficient Nano variant at $0.10/$0.40, targeting cost-sensitive enterprise workloads.
Claude Sonnet 4 remains at $3/$15 per million tokens (input/output), specializing in deep textual and code comprehension with 200k-token context windows. Claude processes entire research papers, contracts, or massive codebases without chunking. However, Claude remains primarily text-focused with image analysis but no generation capabilities. Haiku 3.5 is one of the cheapest options for scale workloads at $0.80/$4.
Gemini 3 Pro achieved the highest Elo score with state-of-the-art multimodal processing capabilities and a 1-million-token context window. Gemini Enterprise's unique combination of security, multimodality, and native Google Cloud ecosystem integration gives it a decisive edge for regulated industries. However, GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet remain attractive for organizations prioritizing rapid experimentation without infrastructure overhead.
Pricing strategies and cost optimization
An industry analysis noted an 83% drop in GPT-4o pricing throughout 2025. Providers are lowering barriers as competition intensifies. Prompt caching lets you reuse static system or context prompts at a fraction of the cost—up to 90% savings on repeated inputs. Batch processing halves input/output costs for asynchronous tasks like ticket summarization or daily report generation.
Claude models are available on Anthropic's API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud's Vertex AI. Enterprise packaging typically includes SLAs, compliance, and support. Pricing is structured around token usage plus any cloud provider overhead. For organizations already invested in AWS or GCP, Bedrock or Vertex AI deployments eliminate separate vendor relationships and consolidate billing.
Reasoning models and autonomous agents
The emergence of reasoning models like Claude 4, Grok 3's Think mode, and Gemini's Deep Think represents a fundamental shift toward more deliberate, explainable AI decision-making. This trend is accelerating in 2025, with all major providers developing enhanced reasoning capabilities. The models represent a transition from question-answering systems to autonomous agents that can plan, execute, and iterate on complex multi-step projects without constant human oversight.
Multimodal integration with video, audio, and image understanding is becoming standard rather than a premium feature. GitHub selected Claude Sonnet 4 for Copilot, validating its coding superiority. Microsoft's continued GPT-4 integration across Office demonstrates the value of broad capability sets. Industry partnerships reveal strategic positioning: organizations are selecting models based on workload-specific strengths rather than all-or-nothing vendor commitments.
Context management for multimodal workflows
Multimodal AI introduces new context challenges. A single workflow might involve processing a PDF document, analyzing embedded images, transcribing an audio call, and generating a summary report—all while maintaining continuity across sessions. Traditional context management approaches designed for text-only LLMs break down when dealing with images, audio clips, and video frames.
Thread Transfer addresses this by bundling multimodal context into portable, deterministic packages that preserve the full conversation history—text, images, and metadata—across tool boundaries. When an enterprise workflow involves multiple AI calls (document intake, image analysis, report generation), maintaining context continuity prevents redundant re-processing and ensures consistent outputs.
Organizations report 40-80% token savings by distilling multimodal conversations into structured bundles that eliminate redundant image re-uploads, duplicate text prompts, and unnecessary API calls. For enterprises processing thousands of multimodal workflows daily, this translates to substantial cost reductions and faster execution times.
Security and compliance considerations
65-71% of organizations have reported regular AI usage in at least one function as of 2024-2025. With multimodal AI handling sensitive documents, medical images, financial data, and proprietary R&D materials, security and compliance are non-negotiable. Models deployed on-premises or in private cloud environments (like Phi-4 for manufacturing) ensure data never leaves the facility.
Compliance teams evaluate whether multimodal models retain training data, how they handle PII in images and documents, and whether inference logs are accessible for audit purposes. GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 requirements shape vendor selection. Anthropic's constitutional AI approach and OpenAI's enterprise SLAs address many of these concerns, but organizations in highly regulated industries often require air-gapped deployments or on-premises inference.
Implementation playbook
Start with a narrow, high-value use case: document compliance review, field service image diagnostics, or R&D paper summarization. Pilot with a single model (GPT-4o for speed, Claude for deep reasoning, Gemini for multimodal breadth) and measure baseline performance—accuracy, latency, cost per query. Establish guardrails: human-in-the-loop review for high-stakes decisions, fallback mechanisms when confidence scores are low, and version control for prompt templates.
Build context management into the architecture from day one. Multimodal workflows generate large payloads—a single PDF with embedded images can exceed 100k tokens. Without caching, batching, or compression strategies, costs spiral. Use prompt caching for static system instructions, batch processing for non-urgent tasks, and context bundling to avoid redundant re-uploads.
Monitor usage patterns: which modalities are most frequently queried, where latency bottlenecks occur, and how often human review is required. Iterate based on data. If image analysis dominates, consider a specialized vision model. If document processing is the primary workload, evaluate OCR-optimized models like H2OVL. Multi-model strategies allow you to route queries to the most cost-effective, performant option for each task.
The path forward
Multimodal AI in 2025 is no longer experimental. It's production-ready, cost-competitive, and essential for enterprises handling diverse data types. The organizations winning are those treating multimodal capabilities as infrastructure—not isolated pilots—and building context management, cost optimization, and security into the foundation. The shift from text-only to multimodal isn't about adopting new models. It's about rethinking how enterprise data flows, how teams collaborate, and how AI integrates into critical workflows.
Learn more: How it works · Why bundles beat raw thread history