Skip to main content

Thread Transfer

Voice AI Agents: State of the Art 2025

If your voice agent takes longer than 800ms to respond, you're already losing the conversation. The Voice AI market is growing at 34.8% CAGR. Here's how to deploy production voice agents with sub-500ms latency.

Jorgo Bardho

Founder, Thread Transfer

August 21, 202517 min read
voice AIconversational AIGPT-4oClaudecall center automationlatency
Voice AI agent conversation flow diagram

If your voice agent takes longer than 800ms to respond, you're already losing the conversation. The global Voice AI Agents Market has expanded from $3.14 billion in 2024 to a projected $47.5 billion by 2034—a 34.8% CAGR. Gartner predicts conversational AI will reduce customer service costs by $80 billion by 2026. But the technology has reached an inflection point: latency is now measured in milliseconds, not seconds, and enterprises are deploying production voice agents that feel genuinely conversational.

The 2025 latency standard: sub-500ms or irrelevant

Human conversational benchmarks set the ideal turn-taking delay at about 200ms. Production voice AI agents aim for 800ms or lower, with the best systems targeting sub-500ms initial response times to maintain conversational flow. AssemblyAI published a guide in July 2025 showing how to build a voice agent in Vapi that achieves ~465ms end-to-end latency—fast enough to feel truly conversational. Retell AI's industry-leading 620ms latency with transparent SLA alignment positions it as the top choice for enterprise contact center automation.

Twilio's platform is built for live conversation with less than 0.5 second median latency and less than 0.725 second at the 95th percentile. Even pauses as short as 300 milliseconds can feel unnatural, while any latency beyond 1.5 seconds rapidly degrades the experience. The most important metric is Time to First Audio (TTFA)—how long it takes for the agent to start speaking after the customer finishes. Some systems "game" this with filler audio ("uh-huh," "let me check"), but measuring time to the first relevant response is more meaningful.

GPT-4o vs. Claude: the voice AI showdown

OpenAI's GPT-4o and Anthropic's Claude are leading large language models in the voice AI landscape, each offering unique strengths. GPT-4o is an autoregressive omni model capable of processing and generating text, audio, image, and video inputs and outputs, trained end-to-end across multiple modalities. OpenAI's Realtime API (beta) offers near-instantaneous response for simple tasks, with speech-to-speech capabilities that bypass traditional transcription workflows, targeting 500ms time-to-first-byte latency.

Pricing for GPT-4o is $0.0025 per 1,000 input tokens and $0.01 per 1,000 output tokens, while the Realtime API costs $0.10 per 1,000 input tokens and $0.20 per 1,000 output tokens—a substantial premium for real-time voice capabilities. Anthropic began rolling out a "voice mode" for its Claude chatbot apps in May 2025, allowing Claude mobile app users to have complete spoken conversations. By default, voice mode is powered by Claude Sonnet 4. The agent's natural-sounding voices are powered by a collaboration with ElevenLabs, delivering high-fidelity, expressive speech synthesis.

With Anthropic's voice mode, users can chat about documents and images, choose from five distinct voice options, switch between text and voice on the fly, and see a transcript and summary following conversations. Claude is best for conversational agents with low-latency expectations and frequent interruptions. Anthropic's Claude family offers strong performance with an emphasis on fast, human-like response flow. In live agents, Claude often feels more natural due to quicker token output and better behavior in open-ended dialog. Claude consistently delivers first tokens within 100-200ms and maintains smooth, predictable streaming rates.

Customer service agents, real-time translation systems, or interactive entertainment applications that prioritize speed often perform better with Claude than with alternatives. However, compared with GPT-4, Claude may not be as suitable for very complex queries or long task chains, but it's an excellent choice for fast, predictable customer interactions. Companies using Claude report they're "not just automating customer service—we're elevating it to truly human quality," which lets support teams think more strategically about customer experience.

The voice AI pipeline: STT to LLM to TTS

At its core, the user's speech is transcribed, the transcript is processed by an LLM, then the resulting tokens are synthesized into audio: Speech-to-Text (STT) to Large Language Model (LLM) to Text-to-Speech (TTS). Each component contributes to total latency. ElevenLabs Flash v2.5 is engineered specifically for low-latency applications, achieving an impressive 75ms time-to-first-byte. OpenAI's Realtime API offers speech-to-speech capabilities that skip traditional transcription workflows entirely, reducing pipeline complexity.

Fortune Business Insights projects the global speech recognition market will reach $19.09 billion in 2025, driven by a 23.1% compound annual growth rate as AI voice agents and real-time applications become mainstream. Modern Voice AI achieves sub-second latency for real-time transcription, making live global broadcasts genuinely viable for the first time. For enterprise deployments, organizations must budget end-to-end latency (telephony to STT to reasoning to TTS), with sub-second round-trip being the bar for natural turn-taking.

Engineering strategies for ultra-low latency

Sierra rebuilt their agent runtime as a concurrent graph, not a sequential pipeline. Parallel execution runs independent tasks—abuse detection, retrieval, API calls—simultaneously, synchronizing only when dependencies require it. This architectural shift cuts latency by 30-40% compared to sequential processing. If possible, prefer web-based WebRTC connections over traditional telephony. WebRTC can reduce latency by up to 300ms and provides greater control over latency-relevant settings.

Released July 7, 2025, Warm Transfer 2.0 reduces handoff latency by 40% through pre-established connection pools and context pre-loading, ensuring seamless transitions from AI to human agents without conversation gaps. This is critical for escalations: when a voice agent determines it can't resolve an issue, the handoff to a human must be instant and context-preserving. Customers who've already explained their problem don't want to repeat themselves.

Call center automation: the $80 billion opportunity

Gartner's Magic Quadrant for Conversational AI Platforms (2025) predicts conversational AI will reduce customer service costs by an estimated $80 billion by 2026, with automation driving 1 in 10 customer interactions—a major increase from 1.6% in 2022. Deloitte's 2025 global predictions indicate that 25% of enterprises already using generative AI are expected to deploy AI agents by the end of the year, with that figure projected to double by 2027.

Deploying AI voice agents can reduce average call handling time by up to 30%, freeing teams for high-empathy interactions. Case studies show 42% improvement in call efficiency and 38% reduction in telephony spend. Enterprises using AI voice systems handle 20-30% more calls with 30-40% fewer agents. For customer support, sales, and appointment scheduling, voice AI is no longer experimental—it's ROI-positive infrastructure.

Telephony integration without forklift upgrades

Open APIs preserve existing telephony infrastructure. Platforms like Retell support SIP, Twilio, and Vonage out of the box, meaning no forklift upgrades are required. Synthflow connects directly with enterprise systems including Cisco, Avaya, Genesys, RingCentral, and more, offering instant compatibility and faster time to value. For call center automation, enterprises must add speech-to-text, telephony integration, text-to-speech, and compliance layers on top of base LLM frameworks.

Seven frameworks represent the state of the art in agent orchestration for enterprises in 2025: LangChain, AutoGen, and Semantic Kernel are the most enterprise-ready today. However, none of these frameworks are "plug and play" for voice—they're designed for text-based agentic workflows. Enterprises building production voice agents need purpose-built platforms that bundle telephony, STT, LLM orchestration, TTS, and compliance into a single stack.

Leading voice AI platforms for enterprise

Synthflow offers an end-to-end Voice AI platform with in-house telephony, proven deployment framework, and ROI delivered in weeks. Retell AI features industry-leading 620ms latency, transparent SLA alignment, and comprehensive feature set positioning it as a top choice for enterprise contact center automation in 2025. Telnyx spent over a decade building a robust, global, carrier-grade voice network, colocating dedicated GPUs with telephony PoPs for ultra-low latency and powerful call control. Bland AI is trusted by companies like Samsara, Snapchat, and Gallup to automate customer support, sales, and more.

Key differentiators among platforms: latency SLAs (does the vendor commit to sub-800ms round-trip or just advertise it?), compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI for payment handling), telephony flexibility (can you bring your own carrier or are you locked in?), and LLM routing (can you switch between GPT-4o, Claude, and open-source models based on workload?).

Emotional intelligence and conversational naturalness

Hume AI trained its speech-language foundation model to verbalize Claude responses, powering natural, empathic voice conversations that help developers build trust with users in healthcare, customer service, and consumer applications. Hume's EVI is noted for its conversational naturalness which makes it exceptional for phone support—it recognizes tone, emotion, and phrasing, keeping interactions warm and efficient. Intelligent end-of-turn detection ensures conversations flow smoothly without awkward pauses or interruptions.

Emotional intelligence in voice AI is the next frontier. It's not enough for an agent to understand words—it must recognize frustration, urgency, confusion, and satisfaction. A customer calling about a billing error sounds different from one asking for product recommendations. Tone-aware agents can escalate frustrated customers faster, offer reassurance to confused callers, and maintain a friendly demeanor with casual inquiries.

Security and compliance for regulated industries

Leading platforms like Retell AI are SOC 2 Type 1 and 2, HIPAA, and GDPR compliant, meeting all industry compliance standards. Enterprise-grade voice platforms provide PCI-compliant masking of credit-card numbers, Social Security digits, and PHI, safeguarding customers and auditors alike. For healthcare, financial services, and insurance, compliance isn't optional—it's a deployment blocker. Voice AI vendors must demonstrate audit logs, data residency controls, role-based access, and encrypted storage.

By 2025, AI voice automation represents the intersection of operational efficiency and customer experience excellence. Enterprises no longer view conversational AI as an optional add-on but as a strategic necessity for scalability, compliance, and service quality. Organizations that deployed pilots in 2023-2024 are now scaling to production, handling thousands of daily calls with voice agents that sound indistinguishable from human operators.

Context preservation across voice interactions

Voice AI introduces unique context challenges. A customer might call back three times about the same issue, speaking to different agents—human or AI—each time. Without context continuity, they repeat their story, frustration compounds, and CSAT scores drop. Thread Transfer addresses this by bundling conversational context into portable packages that preserve the full history—call transcripts, sentiment analysis, resolution status—across sessions and systems.

When a voice agent escalates to a human, the human needs instant access to what was already discussed. When a customer calls back, the next agent (AI or human) should know the previous conversation without asking. Context bundling eliminates redundant questions, reduces call time, and improves customer satisfaction. For enterprises processing thousands of voice interactions daily, this translates to measurable efficiency gains and higher NPS scores.

Choosing the right LLM for voice agents

The best model depends on your voice agent's specific goals, constraints, and user experience needs. Low latency and interruption resilience may be more important than raw intelligence for real-time voice agents. Multilingual support and hallucination resistance vary widely and must be tested in context. System architecture and orchestration often impact performance more than the LLM choice itself.

For customer service agents with low-latency expectations and frequent interruptions, Claude offers fast, human-like response flow with 100-200ms first token delivery. For complex queries requiring multimodal understanding (e.g., "I'm looking at this product page, why won't the checkout button work?"), GPT-4o's vision capabilities shine. For cost-sensitive workloads at massive scale, open-source models like Llama 3 deployed on enterprise infrastructure can deliver comparable performance at a fraction of the API cost.

Implementation playbook

Start with a narrow, high-value use case: appointment scheduling, order status inquiries, password resets. These workflows are high-volume, low-complexity, and have clear success metrics (call deflection rate, time to resolution). Pilot with a single platform (Retell for latency, Synthflow for telephony integration, Bland for ease of deployment) and measure baseline performance—latency, accuracy, escalation rate, CSAT.

Establish guardrails: confidence thresholds for escalation, forbidden topics (don't let the AI discuss legal liability or make pricing commitments), and fallback mechanisms when speech recognition fails. Monitor usage patterns: which intents trigger the most escalations, where does the agent misunderstand, how often do customers interrupt mid-sentence. Iterate based on data. If appointment scheduling works, expand to FAQs. If FAQs work, pilot billing inquiries.

Build context management into the architecture from day one. Voice interactions generate large transcripts—a five-minute call can produce 1,000+ tokens. Without compression, caching, or summarization strategies, costs spiral and latency degrades. Use prompt caching for static system instructions, batch processing for post-call analytics, and context bundling to preserve conversation history across sessions.

The path forward

Voice AI in 2025 is no longer a proof of concept. It's production-ready, cost-competitive, and essential for enterprises handling high-volume customer interactions. The organizations winning are those treating voice AI as infrastructure—not isolated pilots—and building latency optimization, context management, and compliance into the foundation. The shift from human-only call centers to AI-augmented operations isn't about replacing people. It's about freeing humans for the interactions that require empathy, creativity, and judgment—while automating the repetitive, high-volume, low-complexity calls that drain time and resources.